Prediction of Lex Abram vs Jonathan Bejar Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Abram vs J. Bejar

Lex Abram

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Jonathan Bejar

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Abram 1 - 0 Bejar

They have played 2 sets in total, with Lex Abram winning 2 and Jonathan Bejar winning 0. The last match between Lex Abram and Jonathan Bejar was at the Australia F10, 14-11-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Lex Abram getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Abram	1
Bejar	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Australia F10(11-14-16)

Stats

Lex Abram

Jonathan Bejar

L. Abram vs J. Bejar H2H Profile

L. Abram	Stats	J. Bejar
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
37.50% (6-10)	Career Total W/L	21.05% (4-15)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Abram vs J. Bejar Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lex Abram has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jonathan Bejar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lex Abram, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jonathan Bejar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Lex Abram has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonathan Bejar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Lex Abram has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jonathan Bejar winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Lex Abram has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Jonathan Bejar has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 1/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/9).
Player level: In the last year, Lex Abram has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jonathan Bejar has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lex Abram winning 1 times and Jonathan Bejar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lex Abram winning 2 and Jonathan Bejar winning 0.
The last match between Lex Abram and Jonathan Bejar was at the Australia F10, 14-11-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Lex Abram getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lex Abram has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jonathan Bejar has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lex Abram has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonathan Bejar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Lex Abram has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonathan Bejar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Lex Abram vs Jonathan Bejar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Abram vs J. Bejar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Abram	Stats	J. Bejar
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Abram Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australia F7 (Brisbane) - 01-10-2018
Q1 Bosko NovakovicB. Novakovic	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Australia F5 (Cairns) - 17-09-2018
Q3 Vincent StouffV. Stouff	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Q2 Matthew WoerndleM. Woerndle	W	3-6 6-3 7-6(1)	Stats
Q1 Josiah RoachJ. Roach	W	6-3 4-6 6-2	Stats
Australia F2 (Mildura) - 05-03-2018
Q1 Socrates Leon TsoronisS. Leon	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Bejar Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australia F3 (Canberra) - 20-03-2017
Q1 Nathan EshmadeN. Eshmade	L	2-6 6-1 6-1	Stats
Australia F2 (Canberra) - 13-03-2017
Q1 Jason TaylorJ. Taylor	L	2-6 7-6(3) 6-4	Stats
Australia F1 (Mildura) - 06-03-2017
Q1 Brock MeurisB. Meuris	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Australia F10 - 14-11-2016
Q1 Lex AbramL. Abram	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Australia F9 - 07-11-2016
Q1 Patrick FitzgeraldP. Fitzgerald	L	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

L. Abram vs J. Bejar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Abram	Stats	J. Bejar
37.50% (6/10)	YTD Win/Loss	21.05% (4/15)
38.89% (14/22)	Sets Win/Loss	27.27% (12/32)
45.35% (151/182)	Games Win/Loss	40.31% (158/234)
44.44% (4/5)	Hard Win/Loss	18.18% (2/9)
0.00% (0/2)	Clay Win/Loss	20.00% (1/4)
40.00% (2/3)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (1/2)
0	Aces Per Game	0.01
0	Aces Total	2
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
0	Total Double Faults	6
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0	Average Opponent Rank	142.63
44% (17/39)	1st Serve %	43% (18/42)
47% (8/17)	1st Serve Win %	56% (10/18)
27% (6/22)	2nd Serve Win %	25% (6/24)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/3)
22% (8/37)	Return Points Win %	33% (17/51)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/1)
37.50% (6/10)	Futures W/L	22.22% (4/14)
38% (6/16)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	21% (4/19)
50% (3/6)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	33% (1/3)
50% (2/4)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (2/6)
71% (7/5)	1st Set Won, Won Match	50% (6/3)
29% (7/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	50% (6/3)
11% (9/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (13/1)